Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?


Hi,

I'd love to hear the impressions of people who've actually spent some time with these speakers to share their sense of their plusses and minuses. Mapman here on Audiogon is a big fan, and has shared lots on them, but I'm wondering who else might be familiar with them.
rebbi
Not to hijack this thread but here is your info regarding the AVM AUDIO MA3.2 MONOBLOCKS
D-CLASS HYPEX
BALANCED AND SINGLE END INPUTS
BI-WIRE-SPEAKER TERMINALS
750-VA-TRANSFORMER WITH 50,000 uF FILTER CAPACITY
240W/CHANNEL 8ohms 430W/CHANNEL 4ohms totally stable at 3 ohms
Please feel free to e-mail me at propofol@earthlink.net for more info
Dennis
Dsremer,

Other than cost, what are the biggest differences between m-sonic/Pascal Class D and AVM/Hypex Class D amps?

THanks.
There is considerable more refinement( you really are not aware that you have exchanged a top A/B dual monoblock with d-class amps). With the AVM mono"s you can adjust the sonic signature with switches on the back... from clear to medium to smooth to match with different speakers, the bass controll is more defined,the bottom end will suprise you there is a clear sweetness to the mids with no glare produced, the upper end is not bright nor does it tend to roll off as some other amps will do.
The d-sonic is used in my home theater with ohm 300 mk11 and it works well with the ohms, they sound faster in response more bottom end (requires a good power cord)
The avm mono's is used in my main system with tyler woodmere's which are a more open top to bottom and can reproduce any weakness in the front end/amp used (also improves with a top power cord)
I hope this helps.. both are very nice power amps but the avm's take it to the next level.
p.s. any body need a M.LEVINSON 336 mine will be available soon
Dennis
Just put my bryston o to my mwt's The prior posts re power are spot on. Bryston plus ohm equals beauty