1. Home
  2. cables
  3. 146425-122613

The Science of Cables

It seems to me that there is too little scientific, objective evidence for why cables sound the way they do. When I see discussions on cables, physical attributes are discussed; things like shielding, gauge, material, geometry, etc. and rarely are things like resistance, impedance, inductance, capacitance, etc. Why is this? Why aren’t cables discussed in terms of physical measurements very often?

Seems to me like that would increase the customer base. I know several “objectivist” that won’t accept any of your claims unless you have measurements and blind tests. If there were measurements that correlated to what you hear, I think more people would be interested in cables. 

I know cables are often system dependent but there are still many generalizations that can be made.
mkgus
douglas_schroeder
1,824 posts
 

From my perspective we have made great progress; we are at the point of asking skeptics to try something. Previously it was all theoretical discussion. Now, there can actually be something done to perhaps change some minds. Because we all know how effective decades of arguing on the topic has been. :(

cd318, would you like to try Schroeder Method of Interconnect Placement?

I am looking for a simple "yes" or "no". Let’s stick to ICs, and if you become abusive or ridicule I am finished discussing it with you. If you say yes, and would like to cordially discuss it, I am open to it.

BTW, for those just joining us... Schroeder Method is at this time still experimental; I advise that it is a "do at your own risk" activity. Thus far there have been no negative outcomes re: equipment reported, but there is concern by some regarding class D amps. I encourage anyone who is not sure to consult with their equipment manufacturer as to suitability of it. (P.S. Ignore laughter and ridicule; push on for an answer to suitability. I have received everything from mockery to congratulations by designers and manufacturers). Curious parties should read the original Audio Blast article on Schroeder Method at dagogo.com

geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
14,147 posts
 
One assumes that’s an example of the soft sell. Nice!
prof
1,741 posts
 
@douglas_shroeder

I imagine that if you would dismiss all these persons' conclusions you would say it is due to confirmation bias. 

FWIW...I personally don't simply dismiss your findings as confirmation bias.

Not that I know either way how the perceived effect is occurring, but I don't dismiss it out of hand.   I'm sure it's fun to play with these things, especially if you get results, obviously.

Though I gave up playing with cables quite a while ago, I still do my own tweaking sometimes(usually with acoustics).  Hey..it's a hobby!
elizabeth
6,726 posts
 
IT is easy to improve video quality in a TV screen with AC tweaks. Power conditioner, Power cords and I found the PS Audio Noise Harvester to increase the clarity of the video from my old Sony Plasma even more, though it was already through the FurmanREF20 and better power cords. My HDMI experience is with one single cord. So I have little experience, other than getting mad with the flimsy wafer supporting the cable end BREAKS.
marqmike
676 posts
 
prof1,732 posts02-21-2019 6:39pm@douglas_shroeder

I imagine that if you would dismiss all these persons' conclusions you would say it is due to confirmation bias.

FWIW...I personally don't simply dismiss your findings as confirmation bias.

Not that I know either way how the perceived effect is occurring, but I don't dismiss it out of hand.   I'm sure it's fun to play with these things, especially if you get results, obviously.

Though I gave up playing with cables quite a while ago, I still do my own tweaking sometimes(usually with acoustics). Hey..it's a hobby!
Prof
 In a way, on this thread, you are still playing with cables. And that is okay. 'Hey it is a hobby'. Agreed.
More to discover