Behringer DEQ2496 - worth using in hi-end system?

You might want to try using it between transport and DAC. Actually, I know you can't do that, Grant, so use it between transport and preamp.

Don't forget to order the microphone.

06-11-06: Drubin
You might want to try using it between transport and DAC. Actually, I know you can't do that, Grant, so use it between transport and preamp.

What are the benefits of this method over the tape loop method, other than freeing up the preamp's tape loop for another purpose? I was thinking the tape loop method offered the flexibility to completely bypass the EQ if I so choose. Placing it between the CDP and preamp does not offer this as the signal still runs through some EQ circuitry even if the bypass switch is engaged, correct?

Also, placing the EQ between CDP and preamp dedicates the EQ to just the CDP, and my other sources do not benefit from the DEQ2496.

If I'm not mistaken, it's a digital EQ, so putting in the tape loop means it will have to perform AD and DA conversion. Placing it between transport and DAC avoids those extra conversions.

Yes, Dan, but I do not own a transport and DAC. I own a Denon 3910 with balanced analog outputs. Therefore, whether I place the EQ between the Denon and preamp, or in the preamp's tape loop, I will still be required to utilize the Behringer's analog XLR inputs and outputs.

For those who own transport/DAC combos, I can see the advantage of keeping the signal processing in the digital domain.

I understand. If the Denon has a digital out, you might want to try that at some point, just to see if it makes a difference.