regarding cantilevered armboards it seems to me we should look deeper into aspects like how long is the cantilever, which forces are put on, which are the mass ratios and which is the source of the resulting energy of the scanning process? If we do so we clearly see why the cantilever beam plays no important role!
Lewm, MS boards are flimsy??? When have you been standing last time on an original Micro Seiki armboard? Or do have double my weight? :-)
Fleib, Dover`s rules do apply to all TTs - regardless of drive mechanism.
Despite the convincing conclusion that platter and tonearm bearing should ideally not interact in relative movements I have experienced that it depends on the way of execution, e.g. in the Continuum or with my Toyo stand.
when the Victor arrives and has been repaired I will look into it again. Thanks all having supported me here so far and exchanged ideas - very helpful indeed !!!
Lewm, MS boards are flimsy??? When have you been standing last time on an original Micro Seiki armboard? Or do have double my weight? :-)
Fleib, Dover`s rules do apply to all TTs - regardless of drive mechanism.
Despite the convincing conclusion that platter and tonearm bearing should ideally not interact in relative movements I have experienced that it depends on the way of execution, e.g. in the Continuum or with my Toyo stand.
when the Victor arrives and has been repaired I will look into it again. Thanks all having supported me here so far and exchanged ideas - very helpful indeed !!!

