I wonder where is Halcro to argue the other side?I think Fleib is doing quite a competent job....
It is clear from previous discussions that opponents of the free-standing armpod will never change their firmly held beliefs....so I felt no need to futilely inflame the situation...😡
I have never argued against the need for maintaining a perfectly regulated dimension from spindle to tonearm pivot....after all, it is the basis of all pivoted arm geometry.
The opponents of separate armpods appear to maintain that only a rigid horizontal member (the stronger and more rigid the better) is capable of achieving this requirement...?
This is a rather limiting view as gravity is a more powerful force than anything invented by man.
With a suitably massive armpod on spikes or appropriate footers, gravity and friction will ensure the necessary and stable relationship between spindle and tonearm pivot is maintained.
In the case of the Kenwood L-07D with its extended ribbed metal casting, it is easy to appreciate (and calculate) the dimensional expansion and contraction which inevitably extends and contracts the tonearm pivot point from the spindle centre with every one centigrade degree of temperature change.
This is NOT a recipe for dimensional stability...😱
The famed Continuum turntables have their tonearm mounting pads totally disassociated from the spindle and platter bearing, being suspended by wires from the top plate and held from the bottom with magnetism.
As Fleib has rightly repeated....it is execution rather than dogma which ultimately determines the value of the methodology.

