TRL 595-how good is it?

I have yet to meet an audionut, or to read a review from an audionut who invested in a modification without a first listen, who then upon initial hook-up reported anything but a glowing review of the product. It's human nature, I suppose. We all want to hear remarkable improvements, and we may subconsciously convince ourselves we hear remarkable improvements regardless of their true merits. I'm guilty of this. I've owned modified CD or Universal players that I thought were better than anything I had previously owned, only to later sell them because there was something about their sound that bugged me enough to look elsewhere for the "ideal" source.

Doesn't it stand to reason that some mod, somewhere, is not be all it's cracked up to be? If so, why don't we read about it? Protection of one's investment and re-sale value? Could be.

Wouldn't it be refreshing if we could feel free enough to admit that what we thought was the Holy Grail of modified sources was just an interesting trinket that temporarily captured our attention along the way?

True, almost everyone posts a glowing review. Ideally you listen before and after the mod. Before the mod, pick out what you dislike about the sound, write it down if you have to (esp since the mod + break-in takes so long and you can forget!). Otherwise, its easy to get caught up in what you already liked from the stock player once you start reviewing the modded player.

I've had a few surprises with digital. I expected my Cary 303 to kill a friend's nOrh CD-1 (in my system). It didn't! I got a NOS Amperex Orange Globe 6DJ8 to replace the more pedestrian Siemens 7308 but instead found that it sounded edgier and less smooth. Funny stuff.

TVAD,
Good point, but on the same topic, one can reverse your post and ask the same about $20,000 units, the owners of these also convince themselves, and would not openly admit a tweaked player sounded as good...they would be more of a fool than the folks who modded units.

Tvad -

I would tend to agree that people generally will utilize self hypnosis or auto suggestion in forming their impressions of their new mod that is in direct correlation to the amount they spent on the investment.
No one wants to say that the 3000,4000,or 5000$ investment they just spent wasn't the "best they have ever heard". LOL!

This is where professional reviews can sometimes help, but these are usually very cautious and qualified.

I do think, in general, however, that most mods of digital and other audio units do make marked improvements so the user is very pleased.
I also think that the ongoing debates as to what mod is the best sounding (TRL, RAM, APL, Empirical, Modwright) is probably just an exercise analogous to hearing about people's gourmet eating habits, albeit an interesting debate.
All of these modders create extraordinary outcomes on their flagship model mods of the day. It is kind of like Aunt Bee and ladies at the Annual Pie Contest on Mayberry RFD. But, as we all know, everyone does not like the same "best" cherry pie recipe.

I guess the question (and solution) for me gains focus when I consider the reports on modder ethics, service relationships, analysis of initial stock plus mod investment cost/benefit, and the general ideal "house" sound of the modder.

In the end, there are a lot of choices for the end user and that is a good thing. People simply just need to do their homework.

Lkdog, well said on every point. Your post should be Perma-Plaqued and hung in every "What's the Best", or "This Beats That", thread.