Under rated speakers due to price....?


AND the resulting associated equipment?

I have a theory and am interested what others think about it. Is it possible that we underrate some speakers because they sell for a reasonable price and therefor listen to them with similar equipment?

I have a decent system consisting of the Rowland integrated amp, SCD-777ES and normally Aerial Model 6 speakers with a Storm III. I have frequently purchased many "cheap" speakers for second systems and I always try them in the good system just for kicks. Some sound OK, but some sound great. I recently tried a pair of less than $300 (Circuit City price) Polk RT35i speakers in the good system and could not believe how awesome they sounded for 1/10 the price of the Aerials. I could easily see some new high end company selling a similar sounding product for 5 times the price and getting it with happy customers.
I then thought about it - - how often do you hear about 2-500 dollar speakers being paired with a 10k system? Has anyone ever checked the associated equipment in Stereophile's class A speakers against the class B or C's? I didn't have the patience. But I bet as a rule that exotic speakers like Grand Utopias or Pipe Dreams are NOT listened to with low hi-end equipment like the lesser speakers are. If you pair some Vandersteen 2c's or B&W CDM-1's with Boulder amps, (and list the speakers at 10 grand) might people call them "some of the best?"
jimmy2615
Tweekerman: In another post (today) you state that you never heard an electrostatic speaker until 3 weeks ago. I can understand your enthusiasm, but please take the Thorazine as Cornfed suggested.
more clear; inform the judges they are to decide between 7 different amp. manufactures and that the speakers remain equal regards
Dekay if what Plato, Gasman, Thorty40, Fmpnd, Alberporter, and especially Chuckie says is near the truth its ALOT nearer the truth than most "professional" audio reviewers... agreed. point being if you read speaker reviews on boxspeakers you'll want to run out and get'em right now. and if i did and then i heard electrostats after purchase, i would think "only if i had waited and saved up alittle more and got EXACTLY WHAT I WANTED, without being influenced by a "professional's" opinion. yea its mostly my fault for not researching, but there are ten times as many boxes out there than electrostats so you think box MUST be the way to go. i get sucked in pretty easy. but like Hendrix says "are you experienced" yes, now i've been turned on. thats what is so nice about the new audio world lots of products hopefully we'll chose the best for our music and our wallets...anyway thats the way i see it or better, hear it. by the way i've never heard a box owner saying "and the heavens opened up" ,"its like the musicians were there in the room" which are common testamonials from electrostat owners. i've had my say and now i'll chill
Tweekerman, you do know there are sonic drawbacks to ESLs, right? ESLs are impressive in the own right. But, it's not like they are the Second Coming of Christ, or something.
Aroc, Plato just sent me a email, says "great dynamic capabilities does not rate as highly on your own list of priorities" very well said. no not as great an event as the Second Comimg but still a revelation.