Machina Dynamica


Does anyone take the products that Machina Dynamica sells. There is a bell for sale here where you are supposed to ring it in different rooms throughout the house. What does that have to do with audio?
128x128stereo5
Csontos wrote,

"Okay. Has anything you've presented gotten past the "preliminary evidence stage" or are they all evidentially preliminary by nature and therefore relegated to the "Kingdom of Faith". Cuz then we're talkin serious "Hocus Pocus". You might want to get out your Ouija board."

Uh, this is a hobby we're talking about, right? Just about everything in this hobby, especially tweaks, are at the "evidence stage," you know, until someone with some authority steps up to the plate and attempts to get to the bottom of some of these things. Things like SteinMusic Harmonizer, Bybee Quantum Filters, Mpingo Disc, Shakti Stone, Schumann Frequency Generator, CD demagnetizers, tiny little bowl resonators, things of that nature. Even audio reviewers, bless their hearts, rarely offer any in-depth analysis, much less measurements, of these controversial or unconventional devices beyond the usual, "I have no idea how these things work but work they do." I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but if you're sitting around twiddling your thumbs waiting for some "recognized authority" like MIT or AES or NASA or even The Absolute Sound, Stereophile or Positive Feedback, you had probably better be prepared to wait a very long time. In the meantime, preliminary evidence will have to suffice, that evidence being the experiences of audiophiles like yourself.
( LOL...you too no doubt)...Have you gone over your own post that I last responded to? Let me reword as per your#5. Has there been "sufficient evidence presented" to "warrant further investigation" of one of your "unusually phenomenal" products? If so, please present it here to us. Or must we enter the "Kingdom of Faith" in order to verify your claims? Do you charge admission? How much? Let me guess.
Raytheprinter wrote,

"Geoff made it in ,Ripoff Report,The following is from James Randi's website (www.randi). Do not fall for this scam. Read everything Randi has to say about this company!"

Yeah, right. James Randi wouldn't have any reason to lie, would he? Lol
Csontos wrote,

Has there been "sufficient evidence presented" to "warrant further investigation" of one of your "unusually phenomenal" products? If so, please present it here to us."

Sufficient evidence? Uh, and what exactly do you think constitutes "sufficient evidence?" and to whom? And who should be providing the evidence and doing the further investigation? Most likely not anyone here on this thread as they've already made their minds up. There's a name for that but it escapes me at the moment.