Machina Dynamica

"I am not terribly impressed ..." Neither am I. Where's the proof for your bold claim -- except another bold assertion -- backed by more claims? Put up.

Real science is validated by peers. Psuedo science requires no verification, just the word of the man behind the curtain (trust me it's true!). If what you are saying were even remotely close to the truth it would be validated and there would be no controversy. It is far easier to scam the unsuspecting and gullible. You are the absolute king of arguing in a circle. Pardon me if I am not at all impressed by your claims and find them utter and total BS. If I had been drinking milk the first time I read your explanation, I would have had milk coming out my nose too.

Mapman, you are right. It is like very bad science fiction. Get a load of the pictures posted with the flying saucer tweak. Looks suspiciously like the Jupiter 2 doesn't it? The monsters in rubber suits can't be far behind. I can picture the ad now. Place the rubber suit of the monster from Alpha Centauri in any room in your house except your listening room. If you have it in the room you listen in you may end up scared and ruin your mind matter interaction. The more rooms you place them in, the smoother your highs will be and your soundstage will really open up. Your jaw will drop when you hear the difference. They can be yours for the low low price of $299 each. Made up testimonials available upon request.

Csontos wrote,

"Okay. Has anything you've presented gotten past the "preliminary evidence stage" or are they all evidentially preliminary by nature and therefore relegated to the "Kingdom of Faith". Cuz then we're talkin serious "Hocus Pocus". You might want to get out your Ouija board."

Uh, this is a hobby we're talking about, right? Just about everything in this hobby, especially tweaks, are at the "evidence stage," you know, until someone with some authority steps up to the plate and attempts to get to the bottom of some of these things. Things like SteinMusic Harmonizer, Bybee Quantum Filters, Mpingo Disc, Shakti Stone, Schumann Frequency Generator, CD demagnetizers, tiny little bowl resonators, things of that nature. Even audio reviewers, bless their hearts, rarely offer any in-depth analysis, much less measurements, of these controversial or unconventional devices beyond the usual, "I have no idea how these things work but work they do." I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings but if you're sitting around twiddling your thumbs waiting for some "recognized authority" like MIT or AES or NASA or even The Absolute Sound, Stereophile or Positive Feedback, you had probably better be prepared to wait a very long time. In the meantime, preliminary evidence will have to suffice, that evidence being the experiences of audiophiles like yourself.

( LOL...you too no doubt)...Have you gone over your own post that I last responded to? Let me reword as per your#5. Has there been "sufficient evidence presented" to "warrant further investigation" of one of your "unusually phenomenal" products? If so, please present it here to us. Or must we enter the "Kingdom of Faith" in order to verify your claims? Do you charge admission? How much? Let me guess.

Take your time.