Lightspeed Attenuator - Best Preamp Ever?


The question is a bit rhetorical. No preamp is the best ever, and much depends on system context. I am starting this thread beacuase there is a lot of info on this preamp in a Music First Audio Passive...thread, an Slagle AVC Modules...thread and wanted to be sure that information on this amazing product did not get lost in those threads.

I suspect that many folks may give this preamp a try at $450, direct from Australia, so I thought it would be good for current owners and future owners to have a place to describe their experience with this preamp.

It is a passive preamp that uses light LEDs, rather than mechanical contacts, to alter resistance and thereby attenuation of the source signal. It has been extremely hot in the DIY community, since the maker of this preamp provided gernerously provided information on how to make one. The trick is that while there are few parts, getting it done right, the matching of the parts is time consuming and tricky, and to boot, most of use would solder our fingers together if we tried. At $450, don't bother. It is cased in a small chassis that is fully shielded alloy, it gets it's RF sink earth via the interconnects. Vibration doesn't come into it as there is nothing to get vibrated as it's passive, even the active led's are immune as they are gas element, no filaments. The feet I attach are soft silicon/sorbethane compound anyway just in case.

This is not audio jewelry with bling, but solidly made and there is little room (if any) for audionervosa or tweaking.

So is this the best preamp ever? It might be if you have a single source (though you could use a switch box), your source is 2v or higher, your IC from pre-amp to amp is less than 2m to keep capaitance low, your amp is 5kohm input or higher (most any tube amp), and your amp is relatively sensitive (1v input sensitivity or lower v would be just right). In other words, within a passive friendly system (you do have to give this some thought), this is the finest passive preamp I have ever heard, and I have has many ranging form resistor-based to TVCs and AVCs.

In my system, with my equipment, I think it is the best I have heard passive or active, but I lean towards prefering preamp neutrality and transparency, without loosing musicality, dynamics, or the handling of low bass and highs.

If you own one, what are your impressions versus anything you have heard?

Is it the best ever? I suspect for some it may be, and to say that for a $450 product makes it stupidgood.
pubul57
Sounds like you are one of the many who have no need of a active preamp with gain because you already have an abundance of gain from either your source, amp, and or very efficient speakers.
Yes the Lightspeed Attenuator could help here, as well as improve the transparency/dynamics of the sound, being truer to the source than active preamps.

Just a couple of parameters that should be met.

1: Your source cdp or dac's output impedance should be 100ohms or lower (which most are).

2: Your amp's input impedance should be 47kohm or higher (which most are)

3: The interconnect from the Lightspeed to the amp/s should be 1.5mts or less and of good quality

Cheers George
If I may, one corollary to George's rules:
1) despite an on-paper mismatch ( amp with 22kohm Zin ) a passive might work very well...so be sure to try anyway

I am waiting for parts to build my own lightspeed and in the meantime discovered a 25k Noble log pot controlling the volume of my Sacd player sounds fantastic. Macrodynamic shadings, pure sweet treble, no loss in bass lines...etc. the magic is back! I was quite surprised ! My amp has a 22k ohm input impedance.
whoops..stupid droidx autocomplete...Macrodynamic = Microdynamic.

George: regarding the matching, is it a single channel's series/shunt pair that should be macthed, or the left/right series and left/right shunt?
Clio9 has also reported that listening and theory are two different things and he has had excellent results even when the match was less than ideal on paper - so yes, always worth trying.......
When I have tried passives in the past I have had negative results. This is the first time for a very positive one. I suppose I have been too hasty in my previous dismissal of passive as an effective volume control--harumppph!