Passive Preamps

TVAD,
I'm thinking of the 6 Blind Men and the Elephant...all different perceptions.
If I heard your particular passive with your system I may do a complete 180 in my thinking. While I've been exposed to probably more gear than most people I tend to come of as preachy--god I hate when I do that. But for me to categorically say that passives aren't as good is pretty dumb headed of me. In my experience, with the combinations I've heard, I've always prefered an active--I may need more and different comparisons to be won over.

Guys, I'm not one who believes there is a uniformly best anything for any
particular situation. There are always trade-offs to a design, and there are far
too many differences among listener preferences.

I will agree that an active preamp provides easier integration into a wider variety
of systems due to impedance matching and amplifier sensitivity, and in my
experience, not that it means a damn thing, an active preamp has usually
provided a larger "jump" factor to the music. Now, whether this
"jump" factor is faithful to the recording is another matter, but it's
not always a priority to some listeners.

Larry, I have the H2O and Fire preamp. My sound went from edgy and bright, to soft and warm, to just plain natural. These changes occurred while using the same power source. The builder ob both the Fire and the H2O as a much inferior source than I. He has never heard the full potential his gear is capable of. My findings show me his gear just gets better with every positive system change I make. The question is, how did he know which way to design the Fire preamp without knowing it's potential? He knows, because he has an intimate knowledge of all components that goes into making amps. My system is proof supreme knowledge trumps the ear when making judgement calls for excellent designers.

Tvad,

I was qualifying my comment from a 'measurements' perspective (reproducing a signal) - what sounds best with the gear each of us happen to own and our individual tastes will no doubt differ... I hope we can agree on that.

10-10-09: Shadorne
Tvad,

I was qualifying my comment from a 'measurements' perspective
(reproducing a signal) -

I understand. My comment to you had nothing to do with personal
preference.

As designer of audiophile equipment, I am fairly certain Steve McCormack
measures his components on the test bench.

A debate between you two on the topic would be entertaining.