Why not cryo AFTER break in of product?

I would think that due to the fact that cryo treatment changes the structure of the metal conductor at the molecular level, that you would have to break the cable in all over again. Why would you want to have to break the cable in twice?

If you are writing about cables, just moving the cables around, bending them, unbending them.. messes up the 'break-in'. Ditto after a cable is cryo'ed. The more you bend/twist it, the the more "un-cryo'ed" it's going to be.
And has anyone had experience with a cryo'ed cable, that was so rebent, retwisted and replaced after the cryo, it totally lost all the benefits of the cryo?
Ditto single crystal copper cables, the more they get bent, twisted, replaced and recoiled again.. the more broken up the crystaline structure will be. (One reason to be careful about used cables of this type!)

Rcrerar are implying that break-in does not effect the molecular level of the conductor?

The two words might sound the same, but how does bending a cable affect -- or break -- the molecular structures in a cable? I was under the impression that cryo treatment does not mean making "crystaline" ice cubes in the cable that they could be broken by moving it, rather it changes the molecular properties of the material itself. I don't get it, please explain.

Also, any audio manufacturer inevitably sends their cables to a cryo treatment firm, unpacks, puts it in the freezer unit with a bunch of other stuff, takes it out, packs, ships it back, gets handled and repacked, shipped to you. Then you straighten the cables, hook it up, adjust your speakers here and there over the lifetime of the cables, maybe A/B a couple of them. That makes cryo kind of useless, if it's true: set it in there, leave it alone (since by the time you compare before and after, cryo has lost its benefits).