"- A polygraph? ...... ;-)"
Yes, with a complete FBI investigation.
774 responses Add your response
Pictures: A 4 AWG connected to a B&W802D: https://imgur.com/a/42eh3h1 The other end is connected to a 250W PASS LAB power Amp.made for a friend in Israel: https://imgur.com/a/LF0vyGZ A set of 0 AWG cables before shipping to my friend in Canada: https://imgur.com/a/gkuHdcD An other view of 1 set: 0 AWG 2.5m long, to connect between a 250W EMPTICA power Amp. and a pair of Vienna acoustics Beethoven speakers: https://imgur.com/a/qwcIbTn For both cables, the outcome was noticable. This is the comment of the 0 AWG cables replacing a 12’ 14 AWG set: "My initial impressions: It’s like having new speakers. The sound is pure and clean. Minute details are suddenly apparent. The range is amazing. Highs, mid-tones and a new bass that I didn’t know my speakers were capable of. It feels that for all these years my speakers were being choked, and now can suddenly breathe and have their full voice. To say I’m happy about my new Lang speaker cables is an understatement. I’m thrilled. Thank you for building these superbly engineered cables to unleash the full potential of my home sound system". For posting pictures to this site / forum: Use his site to upload: https://imgur.com/a/42eh3h1 Add a new post. Copy the URL address (https://imgur.com/a/gkuHdcD) and paste it here. It works! |
Regarding Mr. Dill’s Q: " What about a double run of 0 AWG wire? Should be twice as good ...." The low cable resistance has an optimum value. After that, getting more gauge, would have little or no benefit (sonic) but will cost way more, as more material and labor are involved. This optimum value need to be calculated. The result, should be rounded up to the next AWG avaliable on the guage table: https://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htm Ref. to this table, a 4 AWG cable has a 0.81508 Ohm per 1,000m or 0.00081508 Ohm per 1m to have this as twice as good: 0.406392 Ohm, requires a 1 AWG cable. In other words, if you would need a 1m of 4 AWG, by doubling the length to 2m, it would now require a 1 AWG cable. or two 4 AWG in parallel. Two equal resistors in parallel = R/2 (of half the value of one resistor). If in series, it is 2R (by ohm’s law). |
b4icu, I concur about the importance of AWG. You are ripping yourself off in terms of performance by neglecting the power cabling. You have a lot of performance improvements available to you if you seek out aftermarket (or make your own, if you wish) power cords. You are not at the summit. Work with power cords and the system will improve greatly. I do not need to hear your system to know it. I know you are quite well versed on the theory. Now, ignore it and follow my advice. You will not be disappointed. :) I am not trying to argue with you, but encourage you to go the next step. |
Copper clad aluminum primary wire for audio? I don’t think so. Terminated into those crappy Nakamichi banana plugs ... https://www.amazon.com/GAUGE-POWER-GROUND-CABLE-AUDIOPIPE/dp/B0792HLWY6 |
Mr. Dill, this is not the one you address (Amazone). It is a good 0 AWG cooper wire. I’ll tell you a secret: All cables are having a nylon sleve over, for a reason: So no one can see what is beneath it. No one will cut a cable that cost’s a leg and an arm to check it. The cable they use, is no better. Some are way wors. Nakamichi banana: The Nakamichi banana plugs are the best of all I tryed. The part that goes into the binding post, has the best contact area. The same is used in labs. It also can hold wires up to 8 AWG. No other do. CHORD COMPANY SPEAKER CABLE 4MM BANANA PLUGS (SET OF 2) use the same: http://www.analogueseduction.net/banana-plugs/chord-company-speaker-cable-4mm-banana-plugs-set-of-2.... The Nakamichi are better, The actual cable, is more than the sum of it’s parts. The genuin testemony of my friend (no commercials) is peaking for itself. Even I was surprised for the good. It simply works and do a big change. PS. No thanks for solving the attached pictures issue on this site/forum? |
Mr. douglas_schroeder I oppened this disscusion on speaker cables. Please let's keep it clean from other cables. Thanks. What I think about the subject? The power cord has no significance at all in Audio. It is the last 3’ you tackel, while many are barried in your walls all the way to an AC distribution box and beyond. No one had shown any scintific avidance, of any advantage of one power cord over the other. Tell me pleas, if you use a TOTL US $1,000.- power cord connected to your cattle to boil some water, would it make a better tea? I don't think so. You better use some AC filters, if you live at a place that your mains are noisy. That also may do some ON/OFF turn sequence, to guard your speakers from clicks if any. |
"Mr. Dill, this is not the one you address (Amazone). It is a good 0 AWG cooper wire." - Do the research, I did, your wire is: Audiopipe HWY 836 USA Standard O Gauge Primary Wire PW-0. Audiopipe offers several different gauges of this wire and they are all copper clad aluminum. "I’ll tell you a secret: All cables are having a nylon sleve over, for a reason: So no one can see what is beneath it. No one will cut a cable that cost’s a leg and an arm to check it. The cable they use, is no better." -Not true at all, many of us have done just that. I have re-terminated many cables, speaker, interconnect & power cables. BTW: There are many better banana plugs available, however it seems you are stuck at a price point so you won't consider anything more expensive. Stop acting like you know everything, there are many very experienced members here. |
Mr. Dill This banana plug is as good as it gets. A friend who was a QA at a large hi-tech firm checked the subject and ended up with those over all others. The tip is making a way better contact (felxibility and surface ares), than other methodes. It also last longer and can connect directly to an 8 AWG wire. Thicker than most others would. They can get wires only as thick as 12 AWG. Regarding the cable, it might be some better or more expensive stuff out there. However, the calculations and the results, show no complains. Why pay more? much more? What is the market price for a 2.5m (8') long, 0 AWG speaker's cables set? The last I've hurd of, made by a respected brand (!) was $32,000.- for a 4 AWG. They have on the TOTL a 0 AWG too. I assume it is even more expensive. I can get it done and shipped for way less, including an accurate calculation for the best required cable for the system. Expensive is not a better quality. On a market, that two items will deliver the same, the cheaper will prevail. Regardles of experience, NONE came out with the answer: How to calculate a speaker's cable, or even a clue of what cable is needed. I understand it is hard to admit such a thing, at a time claiming of so much experience. The other ideas were much of let's give it a try and hear if we like it. Not a sucssesive way to get it right on the first trial. If having experience like that count's I'm out. But I think, it doesn't! What is a very experienced member? 10 years, 20 years, 30 years...of experience? I've 45 years. I'm in this hobby since i was 15. I orgenized 6 audio seminars, demos, lectures, on the 3rd, Mr. Yair Tamam, founder of Magico speakers gave a speach on speakers...and the list goes on and on. Experience alone, wont help. Some education in electronics, working with the top Hi-Tech firms, using the ears and mostly what's between them - is more important. The problem (understanding the way how to calculate the speaker's cable by the equipment it connects) is solved. Now it is only for you and other members to accept. Thanks. |
Just seen this add. on this site: http://www.jpslabs.com/speakercable.shtml For jps cables. Not a word on any technical data: resistance, for what equipment they are good for...They do talk about a lot of power (Watts) or current (Amp’s) and a shield for speaker cables: What is that good for, at a time the Amp. output resistance is less than 0.016 ohms (FD=500). This is more like a short circuit. Any one who knows a little in electronics, can tell you it won’t pick any noise. And the output signal is relativly large. They look awsem. I can give them that. Put them a silk tie or a dress and they are ready for a graduation party. Is it important to look that good or is it important to fit the system or produce a btter sound? Somthing must justify the price...So lets do them look good. |
Sorry, I have no picture of that taken. I'll try to explain. The ideais to use a short 8 AWG (the thickest wire that can fit into the banana plug) that is going between the banana plug and the 0 AWG cable. As I said in one of my posts, an 0 AWG can not be soldered. It takes to long till the tin melts. By the time it does, the plastick sleve is damaged and a significant part of the cable's adge is subjected to oxidization. I use a cable shoe to fit (DIN 70 size) and crimp it with a 0 AWG crimping tool. https://www.ebay.com/itm/DROF-Mechanical-crimping-tool-for-10-to-2-0-AWG-6-to-50-mm-Made-of-Steel/16... The 0 AWG is kind of difficult to work with. every step that would be eassy with an ordinary wire (up to 12 AWG) is getting bulky. I do not use spades. They are not good for contact (it gets lose in time) and every here and there it need's to be fasten. An endless maintenance. If you are into make one for yoursrlf, I may offer you that service. |
Going back for a minute to the JPS cable Add.: http://www.jpslabs.com/aluminata.shtml Even though it is a power cable, they state: 60A and 14,000W and 250A and 48,000W. Absolutly impressing... By the AWG standard (https://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htm) a 60A requires an 8 AWG and 250A a 000 AWG (50% thicker than a 0 AWG. Two are required and a GND). None would fit into that cable, even it looks really thick. Do you see the nylon sleev? It’s for you not to see what is beneath it. However, the IEC standard 60906-2 (2011) limits the power to 20A. Older versions are up to 15A. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mains_electricity_by_country Any liscenced electrician would tell you that. What they state is not legal. That would end with burned or melted pins on the plug. A house line is also limited and even the 60A needs a 3 phase instalation. The plug showen is for 1 phase. A long story is told there, without any sense to back up the price (?). I'm just trying to show you guys, what is going on in this dubious industry. My question, is what is that good for? So is the thing with speaker cables. They will tell you a lot to keep a friday night conversation on the subject, to keep you happy, but not much of the most important and required properties. |
Been reading this and find it interesting. I would buy a tinned finely stranded pure copper 0 gauge wire which may actually sound great based on my experience with stranded tinned copper wire from Duelund, Western Electric and Supra. Such wire is available using oxygen free pure copper. Not sure how I would terminate just yet. |
Mr. grannyring What equaipment are you going to connect, and how long your cable is going to be? I’ll repeat my say: not all need a 0 AWG! some don’t need a thick cable at all, some do, some need it even thicker. It better be calculated. It would be a dissapointing DIY project to end it up with no actual sonic benefit. I’m not saying go 0 AWG it’s the best! I’m saying let’s calculate (engineering!) the right cable and than get it, the first time right. |
I understand completely OP. Just looking generally at this topic. 20 feet long. Must run cables under the house to keep it clean looking per wife. Fireplace in the center. Lyngdorf 2170 and Dali Epicon 6. I make cables and do mods as a part time gig. The 2170 is not going ever 🙂 Based on your way of thinking, which I don’t agree with totally, I would need thick gauge. I use 7 AWG now. It comes down to personal preference and listening. However I am always open minded and willing to experiment. You need better conductors than your chosen cable in my opinion. Copper clad aluminum is not as good as I would desire. Thus my post here. |
Я использую перемычки для своих динамиков.
кому нужны банановые пробки ......https://www.amazon.com/OxGord-Commercial-Battery-Booster-Starter/dp/B00JK325V0 |
Your Amp. is class D (Digital PCM). No DF or output impedance is provided: http://lyngdorf.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/tdai-2170-owners-manual_v17.pdf The 30A output is the only clue but not good enough. Speakers: conventional coil loaded. Ok. As so, I'll do an assumption, that the Lyngdorf 2170 have a DF of 250. For 20' a 3x0 AWG might be required. For an 8' a 3 AWG would do. The cables you are using, are too long to my like. I understand your managment desire and other esthetic issues. Fire place steals the mid placment option of the Amp. between the two speakers. Use what ever cable you think is good for you. The one I used had excelent results. You are welcome to take your favorite. |
Mr. sejodiren says: I use jumpers for my speakers. who needs banana plugs... Enjoy. The contact with the clamps of the jumper cables are at a very little area. A good banana plug is way better on contact. also less risky if it disconnects or the red wire touchs the black... The link goes to a 4 AWG cable that claims 500A. by the guage table, a 4 AWG can conduct only 60A cont. or 135A momentary. Just for the record, not that you need that high current. I also do not like that they are molded in two parallel lines. |
Mr. grannyring, you say: "Based on your way of thinking, which I don’t agree with totally, " It is up to you to accept or decline my say. Please be kind to acknowladge me when and if you get any (other) explanation or way to calculate a speaker cable. As far as my search reached, there is nothing else out there. Most just embrace the usual: high purity cooper (in electricity nothing is made under 99.5%) creyogenic treat, bi wire, burn in, or exotic snake oil :-) All non sintific says, that never convinced me to solve the relations or get the true answer. So, good luck with that. |
Thanks @b4icu . I am open to new ideas and do find your ideas interesting. When I say I may disagree I am referring to your chosen cable quality, burn is reality and cryo treatment. Burn in is real and cryo can indeed help the sound. I tend to agree that heavy gauge is usually a plus, not always however. Depends on the rig and listener sonic priorities. |
Mr. grannyring I feel like my idea was not thoroughly understood. It is not about thickening the wire, the thicker - the better. It is about doing an engineering calculation, that is based on the equipment spec., to specify the precise guage your system requires. In some cases, getting closer to that guage would get a better sound, but after reaching that gauge, getting thicker with the cable, will not add quality, only get more expensive. This is not like tuning in with endless try and error, as it is mostly done today. Your chaise after a specific cooper wire, is not the point. You are captive of cable’s manufacturers promo, with promisses that are not helping your sound getting any better. It is only the product getting more expensive. It is an awful VFM. Regarding your say on Burn In and Cryo, let me get a bit humoristic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMGIbOGu8q0 It would get you an idea, what I think about those subjects. Especially at 02:05. Burn In: A cooper wire with some soldered ends does not need any burn in. What is it good for? Well, if a dealer had demonstrate or/and sold a cable, for some $3,000.- US plus. And unfortunately, that is not delivering the promised superiority. What that dealer or sales person can say? "It will open up and sound way better after a burn in". Most customers have nothing to say against this argument that have been common and accepted for no particular reason. It is taken for granted. For the sale process, it is done and dusted. Good for the dealer, not so good for the customer. He was satisfied by a fishy story over a good product. Why playing some music at low volume with those cables, hooked up 24/7 for a week, would do the job better, than giving it a jump start to a car or a truck and get the same amount of current flow in less than a minute? Cryo: https://ptable.com/ Why would element 29 (Cu) change conductivity properties, over othre metals in this table? Did anyone tested a cable befor and after to say what changed regarding conductivity? For all those says (skin effect and others) to get some nderstanding won’t hurt. None been explained nor proved by an experiment. I’m happy we don’t live in times of the Maya empire. That could have end with a human sacrify! on the subject... |
Mr.
grannyring
For the 3x0 AWG suggestion: My suggestion was for 3 AWG at 8'. You require 20'. That increases the cable resistance by 3 and if you go to the guage table it calls for a 3 times 0 AWG to keep it the same as a 3 AWG of 8' long. That's Ohms law. I only use it for this suggestion. Regaring Mr. Dill's remark of what he can hear, no one's ears can replace measurment instrumentations nor engineering calculation. Whatever you like it or not, Audio precision, HP and more are still in business. If ears would do, we would not need them. What you can hear? As you had tried in a blind test listening to all cables from 14 AWG to the 4x0 AWG and your ears pointed towerd a 12 AWG 99.9% pure cooper with cryo and burn in...? Now you can hire this service, as the standard listening to IEEE. |
If 10 people listened live to leaves rustling on a brisk fall day, would all 10 report the same sounds? Would they all pickup the faint sound of a wind chime in the distance? Could they all hear the same birds chirping? I say they would all have similar, but different listening experiences based on focusing on individual things. One may focus in on a bird chirp because they are familiar with that species, another might dismiss that as noise and focus on something else. Do you see where I am going with this? How do you measure that? Music has the same effect on the ears, people hear different things, they focus on different aspects. How do you measure that? Measurements are only a small part of the whole system and listeners that have experimented with all that has been mentioned in this thread, like to use all the different types of cables & tweaks to create the sound they prefer. You are not going to change anyone’s minds here. Your argument has been around for decades and ad nauseam on these type of forums. One can’t listen to cables. I listen to my system with different cables as they do or don’t sound right to me. Cables have no sound, they only contribute to the system’s over all sound, good or bad. |
| Post removed |
"
Doing it with engineering skils is another. I only say that with the engineering skils, you can reach the optimum first time, every time. The listening way, of try and error could be longer, nor promising an optimum result. You may alway assume there is one better out there that would upgrade your sound, without knowing, you are already there and nothing will make it better - only worse. This is the fee of ignorance." That is absolutely ridiculous. My ignorance is continuing to engage in this silly thread, until now ... |
| Post removed |
Mr. stereofro10 I'm sorry for you that after my effort to pass you an insight, you got it all wrong. I see that the say: "It is hard to teach an old dog a new tricks", is true! |
I would like to make myself clear about the speaker cables: Speaker cables were never tackled by the audio industry properly. They've been over looked or got a magic approach, rather an engineering approach. Bad for all of us. The roll of speaker cables is to connect the amplifier and the speakers. But not only. It is also to extend the DF of the amplifier. The higher is the DF the better. However, the speaker cables needs to be also better (lower impedance). There is a relation between the two. This relation can be calculated, as per the cable's length and their gauge. Any approach that goes with an empiric "try and error" is mostly of people who do not understand the technical side of this subject. Others have a business oriented interest to keep the crowd in the dark and feed it with confusion. The less the customers know or understand, the better it is for their business. They can tell fairy tales and sale their products well. Some audiophiles are so deep and badly embedded in that crap, that it will take a brain surgery to get rid of that. For those who think that those wire tales of gauge vs. length on the web are helpful, or that they can keep the "try and error" approach, with no particular formula to get closer or zoom in toward a desire result, rather than try to understand and use some science and sense - this conversation was not for them. For those who may accept that there is a physical (electrical) relation and it can be calculated and implemented, it may be a significant way to improve their sound. Unfortunately, most speaker cables are of 14-12 AWG and with some length from 8' to 24'. For the length, by increase the length from 8' to 16', in order to keep the same resistance of a cable, the cable's cross-section needs to double. For 24' length it needs to triple and so on. The electronic point of view, of looking at the electrical current loop of an amplifier, speaker and cables, the speaker cables are an extension of the amplifier. Actually it is an extension of its DF or output resistor. When using that for the analysis, the speaker has almost no significance, as what its impedance is. It has significance for the amplifier, as of what power it needs to drive: low impedance and low efficiency requires more powerful amplification. Those usually come with higher (and better) DF. That calls for a thicker and lower resistance speaker cable. For most, at a time they are ready to accept the extra expanse on amplification, the speaker cables are way over looked. It is a sad decision as the optimal performance of that system is now limited and held back by the poor speaker cable. People that were using 12-14 gauges, 12' long cables, when replacing it with the right cable as for their equipment (0 gauge and just 8' long for DF=500) the sound had improved significantly. This particular example reflects an improvement of x25. It is a tremendous sonic difference. Sometimes, you hear that say, that at a certain level ($) of a sound equipment, you need to double the budget to get as much as 10% improvement. This is a classic case of a better amplifier with even better DF, without taking in consideration the speaker cables. Now it all the sudden has a mathematical explanation, to support the say.
|
Mr. fedie
Your Vtl 250 mono blocks have a DF of 9.3! (8 ohms / 0.86). https://www.stereophile.com/content/vtl-225w-deluxe-monoblock-power-amplifier-measurements At 4' you may use almost any wire. it won't make any difference. |
Mr. kosst_amojan There is nothing in your observation to disapprove nor approve anything. I'll use Confucius say: The one who asks a question, may look fool for a few minutes. The one who don't, will remain fool for the rest of his lives. |
This has got to be one of the dumbest threads ever created around the subject of cables. I read through every single post, holding back laughing and crying the entire time. The OP of this thread doesn’t have the first idea about the science behind the transmission of amplified sound. Instead of wasting my time explaining to you all what is wrong with these posts... you can start down the road of real understanding by reading this- http://www.roger-russell.com/wire/wire.htm |
+1 morg111! What the heck b4icu is spouting is NOT SCIENCE! Example (one of many): "Unfortunately, most speaker cables are of 14-12 AWG and with some length from 8' to 24'. For the length, by increase the length from 8' to 16', in order to keep the same resistance of a cable, the cable's cross-section needs to double. For 24' length it needs to triple and so on." No. That is not correct. And the cable does not contribute to the Damping Factor (DF). Resistance in an 8 ft length of 12 AWG copper wire is INSIGNIFICANT! |
Mr.
chayro How old are you? Cables calculate? If they could also cook we could merry them. |
morg111, invective aside, is a truth-teller. The article he cites, http://www.roger-russell.com/wire/wire.htm, is science combined with common sense, and a real money-saver. All that said it makes sense to take care (or pay some company some tens of dollars to take care) with the end connectors to amp and speakers. |
@ Cquinn- Sorry, you are right, invective aside, couldn't help it after spending all that time reading this nonsense. But thank you for the backup. |
Mr. stevecham
Thanks for reading, but I'm concerned the way you do it... I wrote that " The electronic point of view, of looking at the electrical current loop of an amplifier, speaker and cables, the speaker cables are an extension of the amplifier ". Let's say you have an Amp. with a DF of 500. What it means, is that the Amp.'s output resistance is 8 ohms / 500 = 0.016 ohms. If you add your 8' 12 AWG copper wire, it is equivalent to: 0.0256 ohms. (it is by the AWG table: https://www.powerstream.com/Wire_Size.htm - using the feet raw, and do 16' as it is 8' for the red, 8' for the black = 8' *2=16' we end up with this 0.0256 ohms. Your cable have a 1.6 times higher resistance than what your amplifier's DF has. This is like degrading your amplifier's spec. to a DF of only 205. The other 300 were desmissed to a time the speaker cables get better. You call it INSIGNIFICANT! (?) If you would have a tube amp. like the Vtl 250 mono blocks, with an output resistance of 0.86 ohms, you would be right. But with a DF higher than 100, your cable are no Transparent Cables, as Mr. chayro, try to claim. They are far from being perfect. They are most likely holding back your system's performance, by 60% or more. If you have spent $10k on your system, try to go ack to the genius who sold you this speaker cable, and try to get a refund of $6k, as that kind of money was spent for nothing. As long as you come up with says that do not rely on some calculations, but only on some bold assumptions based mainly on "Nothing", you can not keep up in this conversation. |
| Post removed |
b4icu- Here is a link to a interview with a amp designer. At the 22 minute mark he discusses they have designed a speaker cable that is the correct impedance for their Ion digital amplifier . Your statement above and now watching this video , this is the first I have ever heard anyone mention this . You are onto something here . https://www.dagogo.com/exogal-interview/ |