Best practices when conducting a DAC comparison

@shadorne Thank you. I have a preamp that will allow for that and I will be using Roon / Tidal.

What I don’t have is the extra isolation platform and footers so that variable is equal.

I’ll do my best to keep levels matched. I know it’s tricky.

I'll also have to get an extra set of matched interconnects.

@willemj   Thank you for your response.

My methodology will not be that rigorous, but I understand and appreciate the points you are making. I'll try to do my best.

I recently compared 6 USB cables and yes, it isn't easy. But I learned a lot, despite the difficulty and tediousness of the process.

Thanks for the reponse. I know it is not easy, and it is precisely for that reason that I deplore the gratuitous praise for some components over others. We are, of course, largely let down by the audio press that mostly only publishes advertorials. They should measure with the expensive audio analyzers that individuals cannot afford to buy, do the double blind listening tests, and help us avoid spending money to upgrade from already perfect components.
I do remember participating in a blind listening tests of amplifiers by Quad's Peter Walker. At the time people were arguing that his new 405 amplifier was not as good as his 303, and that his valve amplifier was actually the best he had ever done. So he had this rig where you could compare without knowing what you were listening to. I thought I could identify them, and he greatly enjoyed demonstrating to me that I had only been guessing randomly. A more elaborate version was published here: http://www.keith-snook.info/wireless-world-magazine/Wireless-World-1978/Valves%20versus%20Transistor...

The thing is, getting to know an audio system takes time. Hearing its strengths and weaknesses is a process that requires time and a multitude of different recordings. Walking up to an unknown system and trying to guess what is what is bound to fail. 

It's funny, when I was into modding my car, these same conversations took place amongst motorheads, with some going by feel and impressions and others demanding dyno numbers..

@david_ten

Well, you may or may not know that I just went through a grueling and somewhat meticulous exercise myself when I received my Yggy.
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/new-yggdrasil-first-and-second-impressions

Grueling because my angst was sort of self imposed in that I had a short return window to work within.

Anyway, long story short, I truly believe I conducted proper comparative testing.

- I used the same (type and length) RCA cables connected to two different source inputs.

- I ensured the volume control on my amp never changed.

- I enlisted the help of another listener.

- I sampled many types, varieties, etc. of music.

- I sampled hi and lo rez formats, but only PCM.

- I tried (and helper) both blind and non-blind testing

- I used a playback source that allowed me to "loop" music (5-20 seconds would suffice)

- Settled on particular music that highlighted the differences. Namely, Elegant Gypsy by American jazz fusion guitarist Al Di Meola. If you can get your hands/ears on that recording, do so. Virtually every second of music on it can be used effectively to A/B among DACS.

- I consulted with other "audio-experts" here on the forum and in a private club I’m associated with, in order to better understand whatever specific nuance I should attempt to listen for.

- I conducted testing at different times of the day, with and without alcohol.

- I conducted testing with equipment cold (initial startup)

- I conducted testing with equipment warm (2 hrs plus on)

- I conducted testing at the PLP in my listening environment AND other locations throughout the room. BTW, many users report how incredibly "live" the Yggy sounds even *in another room* and I cannot agree more. 

- I did other things too, just can’t remember right now :)