@analogluvr
How exactly do you figure inefficient speakers can't be dynamic as all hell given robust power? That math doesn't work. Sure, many inefficient speakers are limp on account of torpid power, but there's nothing inherent preventing them from being dynamic. You accuse me of relaying outdated or inaccurate information, but what you're saying hasn't been true since the power wars of the 70's.
No offense, but you and johnk seem to believe audio hit it's zenith in 1935 or there about and everything since has just been regression. No matter what anybody seeks, you two prescribe massive horn loaded solutions and low power tubes. Prescribe for me the fully horn loaded full range speaker that will fit within 2 or 3 square feet and is suitable for listening at 10 to 12 feet using modest solid state power that costs less that $5000. I think those are very common demands of a great many people here. You guys can't even bring yourselves to admit those speakers don't exist, much less appreciate that's not a practical solution for many. At least HR admitted the 936's came surprisingly close to the dynamics of the Uno Nano's so I know I'm not listening to a couple of compressed piles of junk. You and johnk and a few others talk like there's some vast chasm of difference and that no shortcoming of horns compares to the failings of dynamic drivers. It's frustrating to those who don't agree. And you guys just don't take no for an answer.
The real irony to me is that the same people who vehemently argue for the dynamics of horns are the same who think vinyl is king. You don't get more dynamically compressed than vinyl. Why the big concern about your speakers dynamics when your source can't utilize the capability?
How exactly do you figure inefficient speakers can't be dynamic as all hell given robust power? That math doesn't work. Sure, many inefficient speakers are limp on account of torpid power, but there's nothing inherent preventing them from being dynamic. You accuse me of relaying outdated or inaccurate information, but what you're saying hasn't been true since the power wars of the 70's.
No offense, but you and johnk seem to believe audio hit it's zenith in 1935 or there about and everything since has just been regression. No matter what anybody seeks, you two prescribe massive horn loaded solutions and low power tubes. Prescribe for me the fully horn loaded full range speaker that will fit within 2 or 3 square feet and is suitable for listening at 10 to 12 feet using modest solid state power that costs less that $5000. I think those are very common demands of a great many people here. You guys can't even bring yourselves to admit those speakers don't exist, much less appreciate that's not a practical solution for many. At least HR admitted the 936's came surprisingly close to the dynamics of the Uno Nano's so I know I'm not listening to a couple of compressed piles of junk. You and johnk and a few others talk like there's some vast chasm of difference and that no shortcoming of horns compares to the failings of dynamic drivers. It's frustrating to those who don't agree. And you guys just don't take no for an answer.
The real irony to me is that the same people who vehemently argue for the dynamics of horns are the same who think vinyl is king. You don't get more dynamically compressed than vinyl. Why the big concern about your speakers dynamics when your source can't utilize the capability?