@rodman99999
Interesting conjecture.
But, first, it seems to start by assuming the *audible* phenomenon claimed about such cables is valid, when that is in dispute.
Second, anyone can conjecture, even from already established science - that is after all what scientists tend to do. It's the next step that is important and missing in most cable claims: testing. How would you determine that the aligning process you suggest occurs...and is responsible for AUDIBLE changes in cables?
Wouldn't it make sense that if your conjecture is sound, that measurements would show changes over time - given you are appealing to measurable phenomena in the first place?
And, since it's a fact we can often measure things we can not perceive, if you DID find measurable differences, wouldn't you agree we would need a way of determining if the differences are audible? And if you agree there, why would it make sense to ignore all the data we have about how sighted listener bias can influence results?