I Just Don't Hear It - I wish I did


I am frustrated because I am an audiophile who cannot discern details from so many of the methods praised by other audiophiles. I joke about not having golden ears. That said, I can easily discern and appreciate good soundstage, image, balance, tone, timbre, transparency and even the synergy of a system. I am however unable to hear the improvements that result from, say a piece of Teflon tape or a $5.00 item from the plumbing aisle at Home Depot. Furthermore, I think it is grossly unfair that I must pay in multiples of one hundred, or even one thousand just to gain relatively slight improvements in transparency, detail, timbre soundstage, etc., when other audiophiles can gain the same level of details from a ten dollar tweak. In an effort to sooth my frustration, I tell myself that my fellow audiophiles are experiencing a placebo effect of some sort. Does anyone else struggle to hear….no wait; does anyone else struggle to comprehend how someone else can hear the perceived benefits gained by the inclusion of any number of highly touted tweaks/gimmicks (brass screws, copper couplers, Teflon tape, maple hardwood, racquet balls, etc.) I mean, the claims are that these methods actually result in improved soundstage, image, detail (“blacker backgrounds”), clarity, bass definition, etc.
Am I alone in my frustration here?
2chnlben
Some people will have more sensitive hearing than others. That doesn't mean those with less sensitive hearing have tin ears.
Jylee (System | Threads | Answers)
Absolutely.

However, it would explain why some people report larger differences resulting from tweaks than do other people.

I think it's pretty obvious that most audiophiles have keenly attuned hearing, whether it's a result of concentration, training over time, or better physiology. It's unreasonable to assume, though, that we all hear equally well.
I think your description of physiological superior hearing as a "phenomenon of extraordinary human achievement" is hyperbole that's unfair to the comparison you put forth, which I imagine was intended to be taken seriously.

However, I do believe that the discussion is either genuine, or it's mostly for fun and therefore interwoven with humor. It's unclear to me which direction this thread is taking.

Of course it’s hyperbole – as are the claims! That’s my point.

Yes, it’s for fun. You don’t see the humor!?

I do value this forum and I do ask serious questions and I do learn from the members and I am grateful. I also can’t stand being nice all the time! I get this itch…not really. I just couldn’t keep my proverbial mouth shut on this whole - “You wouldn’t believe what putting my speaker cables on risers did…it opened the entire soundstage up, the background is so much blacker, I can hear new details…” - thing!

Come on. You have to be laughing!
Of course it’s hyperbole – as are the claims! That’s my
point.

2chnlben (System | Threads | Answers)

Well, I disagree that all the claims of hearing benefits resulting from tweaks
are hyperbole. That's my problem with your argument. You seem to be
lumping all reports of positive results as hyperbole.

Now, if by hype you're speaking only of the over-the-top reports of
"jaw-dropping", 25-50-100% improvements, then I agree.

Regarding the cable riser comment, if raising the cables off the floor
somehow reduced low level background noise (how, I cannot say), then I can
believe that the soundstage would open up, blacks would be blacker, and
more details would be heard. Reducing low level system noise is the primary
method of improving a system's sound, whether it's accomplished with better
component power supplies, AC filtering, power cord filtering, shielding of
interconnects, etc. Generally, the results of lower background noise are a
larger and clearer (blacker background) image with more detail. Low level
system noise often cannot be "heard" (like hum or hiss), but it's absence is
more easily detected.

Most tweaks that I'm aware of...and I mean things like isolation/vibration
control, AC tweaks, swapping in better capacitors, etc. reduce low level
background noise to some degree.

Tvad,

What, they’re not exaggerated? Maybe “amplified” would have been a better choice of words! I never said improvements weren’t realized, I merely implied that some of the purported claims of the results gained by employing some (certain) relatively small tweaks seem questionable (“amplified”).

I think it’s true!