---Hey, Geoff. I guess I'm going to take you up on your offer to unload 'angst and disappointment.' Perceive it as you wish. I have no reason or basis to doubt that some folks (folks with no skin in the game) when they say they hear or perceive a difference when they flip cables. It is a giant leap from there, even if there are many folks who "hear" it, to make an unqualified claim that that proves all cables are inherently and audibly directional to the exclusion of all other possibilities.
"Wouldn't it be nice if there was an electronics textbook or a technical paper in some scientific journal that came right out and demonstrated how wire can or cannot be directional? But then all this discourse would stop."
--Did you actually just answer my previous question about what might convince pro-directionality folks that there was nothing to it?
I don't believe it would stop. Not at all. It would just provide something else to bicker about. While I think it would convince some or even many skeptics or "naysayers," I don't think it would convince many pro-directionality folks. I suspect fault would claim to be found in the methodology and/or conclusion or it would be labeled another "appeal to authority" (to which you have inexplicably developed an immunity).
I suspect most of the folks, here, are 40+. This "debate" probably won't die until the "audiophiles" die off and become extinct.

