I have the 2011 remastered version of Achtung baby by U2 and it sounds rather good. Don't know about the original CD though.
Best CDs
I'm new to Audiogon, and know the depth and breadth of the knowledge and experience of the people who post on the Forum, so I apologize for this amateur question. I'm strictly digital. I've just upgraded my system with an OPPO 205, Krell Theater 7WD, Krell Foundation 4K, and B & W 804s, 805s, and center speaker. I've played some CDs (old collection), and they sound awful. Is there a good brand or brands of CD and/or source that I can rely on for future purchases, or is it more complicated than that.
16 responses Add your response
I use an old OPPO bdp80 just as a transport into my DAC. As such it works well enough for the few CDs I play. However running it direct to my integrated via its rca analog outs, while maybe not "awful" is certainly much less tuneful. OPPO may technically be a universal player but it's worst aspect is CD playback imho. Plenty of suggestions here so far but I also agree a lot more information from the OP would be useful. |
Daj2832, you've gotten some good input so far but give us a little more to work with. For example:
|
Here are some alternate opinions on streamers: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/top-music-streamer-for-2019-aurender-n10-s |
If you read the Steve Hoffman Music Forums you will find that original issue (1980s) Cds are back in style, that is, they are often the preferred version. On those forums people have long debates over minute differences between different releases of a particular album as to which is better. A lot of the problem is the Loudness Wars. In the 90s, record companies started compressing the dynamics of Cds so that they sounded loud all the way through instead of having loud parts and quieter parts (check out the Stones "Blue and Lonesome" for an example). Cds from the 80s tend to have greater dynamic range (quieter quiet parts and louder loud parts). Not all low dynamic range Cds are in your face aggressive though. You can have a Cd that is low dynamic range but sounds good. At the Dynamic Range Database site linked above you want to find Cds that have a high rating, green numbers, if possible. Anyway, keep those old Cds. They may not be the problem. I agree with others that the Oppo is not the best option for music. Look into streaming too. That is definitely the direction music distribution is heading and you can get very good sound quality for reasonable prices for a separate streamer and DAC. It’s best to separate the functions because streamers don’t affect the sound as much as DACs (IMHO) and DACs are being improved steadily, so you might want to upgrade the DAC more frequently. I use the Bluesound Node 2 (now Node 2i) streamer. It's very easy to hook up and use and sounds good to me. |
+1 on the comments on the Oppo. I fail to understand why so many on this forum bought these for audio for $$$. I have Oppp 105 and also a Cambridge CXU, use for video ss systems. I play CD's using a transport and running an Audioquest digital cable (Coffee RCA) into a Cambridge 851N. The 851N is an upsampling player to 384KZ. I also play HD Tracks through this player and the CD's can sound amazing. The best CD's out there IMO are SHM from Japan, followed by Blu-spec CD2 (also Japanese) followed by MFSL gold. The very best CD's I have are a couple of Platinum SHM of early Steely Dan. |
I generally not pursue rare or special CDs. Not that I wouldn’t but just haven’t needed to. I start at the dr.loudness-war web site: http://dr.loudness-war.info/ This is a database of all types of media that gives dynamic range measurements by track, album average, low and high. It is my opinion that if the dynamic range is compressed too much then it doesn’t much matter what’s on the CD or how well it was engineered otherwise. Some may disagree but I think you have to start with dynamic range. Once you find the best CD on that site in terms of dynamic range then you can go to eBay (or where ever else) and search. You use catalog numbers, dates or bar code numbers to identify the specific CD. I do not recommend Amazon because the CD identifying info is rarely included. I’ve had excellent success doing this. And CDs on eBay are cheap. Also, almost all CDs produced lately have awful dynamic range. Finally, beware of "remastered" CDs. I have found that they are usually worse than the originals and almost always more compressed. |
Interesting post. Research sites like allmusic or discogs for original releases, it's what I do. Compare an original to the later remaster and decide for yourself. Also, I like MFSL, Audio Fidelity, and some Japanese pressings which I research before purchase. Looking at your gear, I like what I see with the exception of the OPPO Blu-Ray player being used for CD's. |