Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10
I feel better now 😀

**** Same with the African slaves. They were taught Christianity. Had to speak English. Sang English church music Families that did exist were broken up. --- No African Music. No African language. No African Religion. No African families No African anything. ****

Sorry, not true. Well documented in many other sources besides this one:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisiana_Voodoo

From the same article:

++The enslaved community quickly outnumbered white European colonists. The French colony was not a stable society when the enslaved Africans arrived, and the newly arrived Africans dominated the slave community. According to a census of 1731-1732, the ratio of enslaved Africans to European settlers was more than two to one.[3] As a relatively small number of colonists were planters and slaveholders, the Africans were held in large groups, which enabled their preservation of African indigenous practices and culture.[4] Unlike in the Upper South and other parts of British Colonial American, where different groups were brought together and slave families were frequently divided among different plantations, in southern Louisiana families, cultures and languages were kept more intact.[5]++
Since all this is clearly becoming very tiresome, I would like to try and resolve it this way:

There is a huge amount that has been written and stated on these topics by (imo) legions (literally) of authoritative sources that supports my point of view; not difficult to find this info at all.  It would defy logic that if there was any validity to the counter-argument that there would be, at least, SOMETHING written SOMEWHERE to support the opposing point of view.  I hope that we can, at least, agree that our humble little playground of a thread is not the only place where disagreement has been expressed; if there is any.  I pose a challenge:  let's see that material; kindly post some of it.  I don't have a problem with being proved wrong and would welcome it.  
OP:

New name is in order.  Let's Christen him 'The Wiki-Man'.   Without wiki he has no clue.   Hell, even with wiki he is clueless. He does not have any life experiences to call upon, only Google and Wiki, so they can make his arguments for him.  He even has to Google Cuba!!!  Sad.

Cheers