JD, the difference between our points of view is that you appear to be trying to desperately hold on to this years state-of-the-art music reproduction format, and I am looking forward at the possibilities for the next state-of-the-art music reproduction format, in the belief that what is state-of-the-art today will shortly be yesterdays news. The writing has been on the wall for several years as more and more music has been delivered over the internet.
Regarding the vinyl-analog/SACD-digital debate, in my opinion vinyl will survive as an analog delivery method, whereas SACD/CD will either disappear entirely or be relegated to a miniscule digital delivery method.
You wrote:
I would propose by your own definition, even the production of each silver disc is subject to clocking anomalies, since discs are manufactured in batches on multiple CD burners, each of which is subject to clocking issues...as you suggest. Therefore, Chesky, Mapleshade and the like are already settling for degradation of the original.
Anyway, it seems we're picking at the gnat's ass here, and the little bugger just won't stay still long enough to get a firm grip on the sucker...
Regarding the vinyl-analog/SACD-digital debate, in my opinion vinyl will survive as an analog delivery method, whereas SACD/CD will either disappear entirely or be relegated to a miniscule digital delivery method.
You wrote:
Digital reproduction is completely reliant on clocking, and the fact that clocking is not a perfect science, every copy be nature is altered.
I would propose by your own definition, even the production of each silver disc is subject to clocking anomalies, since discs are manufactured in batches on multiple CD burners, each of which is subject to clocking issues...as you suggest. Therefore, Chesky, Mapleshade and the like are already settling for degradation of the original.
Anyway, it seems we're picking at the gnat's ass here, and the little bugger just won't stay still long enough to get a firm grip on the sucker...

